A Juridical Analysis of PPATK’s Dormant Account Blocking Policy: An Examination of Authority and Legal Protection for Account Holders
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study offers a comprehensive juridical analysis of Indonesia’s Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (PPATK) policy to block dormant bank accounts, assessing its legality, constitutional compliance, and proportionality. Employing a normative–descriptive legal research method, the analysis draws on primary sources (Law No. 8/2010 on Money Laundering, the 1945 Constitution, banking and consumer-protection statutes) and secondary sources from Scopus-indexed literature on Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) governance, administrative law, and constitutional rights. Findings demonstrate that PPATK exceeded its statutory authority under Law No. 8/2010 by imposing mass suspensions on 122 million accounts without individualized suspicion of criminal activity, thereby violating the ultra vires doctrine in Law No. 30/2014 on Government Administration. The policy also infringed Articles 28D(1) and 28G(1) of the Constitution by failing to provide pre-deprivation due-process safeguards or narrowly tailored measures, instead relying on post-deprivation remedial procedures. A proportionality assessment, grounded in administrative-law doctrine, shows the blocking policy lacked appropriateness, necessity, and proportionality stricto sensu, as less restrictive alternatives (enhanced KYC, targeted investigations, judicial review) were available. Despite PPATK’s claims of a 70 percent reduction in online gambling transactions, the legal deficiencies rendered the policy unsustainable, leading to its presidentially mandated reversal. Comparative analysis with international FIU best practices underscores the need for statutory amendments to clarify FIU powers, mandatory judicial oversight, and independent accountability mechanisms. This research contributes to Scopus-indexed scholarship by empirically validating theoretical concerns about FIU overreach, offering policy recommendations to balance effective financial crime prevention with constitutional and consumer-protection imperatives.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
[1] Magz TEMPO, “Arbitrary Blocking of Dormant Accounts,” Magz TEMPO. [Online]. Available: http://magz.tempo.co/read/opinion/43326/dormant-accounts-freeze
[2] D. Bartolozzi, M. Gara, D. J. Marchetti, and D. Masciandaro, “Designing the anti-money laundering supervisor: The governance of the financial intelligence units,” Int. Rev. Econ. Financ., vol. 80, pp. 1093–1109, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2022.03.009.
[3] K. J. McNaughton, “The variability and clustering of Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs) – A comparative analysis of national models of FIUs in selected western and eastern (post-Soviet) countries,” J. Econ. Criminol., vol. 2, p. 100036, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100036.
[4] M. Tiemann, “A commentary on the EU money laundering reform in light of the subsidiarity principle,” J. Financ. Regul. Compliance, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 372–378, May 2024, doi: 10.1108/JFRC-10-2023-0172.
[5] Egmont Group, “Public Summary: FIU Tools and Practices for Investigating Laundering of the Proceeds of Corruption,” 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.egmontgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/2019_Public_Summary_FIU_Tools_and_Practices_for_Investigating_Laundering_of_the_Proceeds_of_Corruption.pdf
[6] Swiss Bankers Association, “Guidelines on the Treatment of Assets without Contact and Dormant Assets Held at Swiss Banks,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.swissbanking.ch/_Resources/Persistent/0/c/c/5/0cc5dd74305e62da3342e6edf2b273c053f9f7d2/Guidelines on the treatment of assets without contact and dormant assets held at Swiss banks (Guidelines on Dormant Assets) (May 2022).pdf
[7] N. W. R. Novyanti, P. D. J. I. Kosasih, and D. P. A. S. Wesna, “Bank Customer Protection in Account Blocking from Legal Perspective on Execution Seizure Requests and Bank Secrecy,” J. Law Theory Law Enforc., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 26–37, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.56943/jlte.v3i3.608.
[8] J. Wiwoho, D. B. Kharisma, and D. T. K. Wardhono, “Financial Crime In Digital Payments,” J. Cent. Bank. Law Institutions, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 47–70, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.21098/jcli.v1i1.7.
[9] H. S. Disemadi, “Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies,” J. Judic. Rev., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 289–304, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280.
[10] A. I. Hamzani, T. V. Widyastuti, N. Khasanah, and M. H. M. Rusli, “Legal Research Method: Theoretical and Implementative Review,” Int. J. Membr. Sci. Technol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 3610–3619, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.15379/ijmst.v10i2.3191.
[11] M. Salehijam, “The Value of Systematic Content Analysis in Legal Research,” Tilbg. Law Rev., vol. 23, no. 1–2, pp. 34–42, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.5334/tilr.5.
[12] Wahyudi BR, “Pengaturan Hukum Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK) Sebagai FIU (Financial Inteligence Unit) di Indonesia,” UNES Law Rev., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 9187–9199, 2024, doi: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1874.
[13] T. M. P. Allagan, D. R. Himmah, and T. Aulia, “Supervening Event on International Contracts in Indonesia,” J. Cent. Bank. Law Institutions, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 431–454, May 2022, doi: 10.21098/jcli.v1i2.14.
[14] B. Marbun, B. Santoso, and Yunanto, “The Interplay of Banking Development and Legal Reforms: A Comparative Study of Mortage Rights Enforcement in Indonesia and India,” Lentera Huk., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 231–256, 2024, doi: 10.19184/ejlh.v11.i2.47722.
[15] A. U. Marzuki, “The Authority of the Constitutional Court to Adjudicate State Administrative Cases,” Al-Bayyinah, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 31–44, May 2025, doi: 10.30863/al-bayyinah.v9i1.8544.
[16] Sunarmi, Robert, and D. Sukarja, “Suspension of Payment Decision Cassation: Due Process of Law VS Legal Certainty,” J. Law Sustain. Dev., vol. 11, no. 9, p. e998, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.55908/sdgs.v11i9.998.
[17] L. Tibaka and R. Rosdian, “The Protection of Human Rights in Indonesian Constitutional Law after the Amendment of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia,” Fiat Justisia J. Ilmu Huk., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 266–288, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v11no3.1141.
[18] G. A. Taufik, “Proportionality Test in the 1945 Constitution: Limiting Hizbut Tahrir Freedom of Assembly,” Const. Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45–79, May 2018, doi: 10.31078/consrev413.
[19] Y. Chang and X. Dai, “The limited usefulness of the proportionality principle,” Int. J. Const. Law, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1110–1134, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1093/icon/moab068.